[Cowboy]

Yes I learned how to do it from NMK's excellent video on here. You will have to make the same tool nmk did

[Hrc630]

With the race kit, i run side by side with my friends RZR 900 on pavement.
0 to 50 mph i am in front and he slowly catch me. I run 73 mph GPS and he run 75 mph GPS .
Very close !
In heavy snow i beat the RZR all the way.

[Sockman]

Lined up against a '16 Ranger 900 and he took me fairly easily.  He would jump out about a length ahead and then slowly pull away.

[REDRIDER]

Lined up against a '16 Ranger 900 and he took me fairly easily.  He would jump out about a length ahead and then slowly pull away.

Was that while you were stock or after a switch to B2 on the secondary?

[Sockman]

Lined up against a '16 Ranger 900 and he took me fairly easily.  He would jump out about a length ahead and then slowly pull away.

Was that while you were stock or after a switch to B2 on the secondary?

Stock.  Haven't had the chance to clock the secondary. 

[NMKawierider]

Lined up against a '16 Ranger 900 and he took me fairly easily.  He would jump out about a length ahead and then slowly pull away.

Was that while you were stock or after a switch to B2 on the secondary?

Stock.  Haven't had the chance to clock the secondary. 

It will be a different story after clocking...

[Hrc630]

Just clocked the RZR 900 will beat the ZForce easy. I ride all the time with a Stock ZForce (clocked) a RZR 800 and a RZR 900. There is a huge gap between à RZR 800 and the New 900. A stock Z800 is a little faster than à RZR 800, A clocked ZForce is between a 800 and a 900 but no way on par with the RZR 900s

[REDRIDER]

He was talking about racing a ranger 900. I'm not sure how they compare to the rzr 900s

[Sockman]

He was talking about racing a ranger 900. I'm not sure how they compare to the rzr 900s

Same motor, right?  68hp V-twin.

[NMKawierider]

Not a V-twin but I read in a couple of places the Ranger's is 68hp where the RzR's is 75. Both above our 63. We are lighter though.

[Sockman]

Not a V-twin but I read in a couple of places the Ranger's is 68hp where the RzR's is 75. Both above our 63. We are lighter though.

This guy's Ranger XP is a twin cylinder.  Maybe "V-twin" wasn't an accurate description.  I'll have to ask again, but I thought he was claiming 75hp.  I don't think that's right though.  All the interwebs show it's 68 hp.

[NMKawierider]

Not a V-twin but I read in a couple of places the Ranger's is 68hp where the RzR's is 75. Both above our 63. We are lighter though.

This guy's Ranger XP is a twin cylinder.  Maybe "V-twin" wasn't an accurate description.  I'll have to ask again, but I thought he was claiming 75hp.  I don't think that's right though.  All the interwebs show it's 68 hp.

Yeah that's what I found too on HP. And it's a twin, but an in-line or Longitudinal Twin.

[Hrc630]

My ZForce with the race kit and a lot of tuning is neck and neck with the RZR 900s on a drag on pavement from 0 to 60 mph.  The clocked ZForce is minimum 10 length behin. The stock 3-4 lenght behin the clocked One.
The new 900s is a fast machine stock.

[REDRIDER]

I'm pretty sure the ranger is not as fast as the rzr, It's like why they made the Camaro slower than the corvette lol

[NMKawierider]

I'm pretty sure the ranger is not as fast as the rzr, It's like why they made the Camaro slower than the corvette lol

Lol...it's like the difference between the U-Force and the Z-Force...One's meant to haul hay,.. the other's meant to haul a$$...

Just kidding U-Force owners But one is built to work where the other is built to play.